Quod
satis est cui contigit, nihil amplius optet.
(“Let him who has enough ask for nothing more.”)
(“Let him who has enough ask for nothing more.”)
-Horace
What do we
really need?
Given that
there are roughly 6 billion people on Earth, there are probably 18 billion
different answers to this question. But
it is, we believe, a question that is not asked nearly often enough. It is certainly not asked often enough in
what so many radical activists in the developing world refer to as “the
decadent West”.
There are approximately
300 million people living in the United States.
That means that roughly 1 in 20 folk in the entire world are
Americans. All but the poorest Americans
are in the wealthiest 10% of people in the world. The vast majority of Americans, in fact, are in the top 1% of the world’s wealthy. The poverty
line in the United States for a family of four in 2012 was $23,492. The median
income across 131 countries in 2012 was $9733. That means that poor Americans in 2012 earned almost 2 ½ times as much as the
middle-of-the-road earner worldwide.
Almost half
the world – over three billion people – survive on less than $2.50 a day. The World Bank sets the global poverty line
at less than $2.00 a day. Median income
in the U.S. in 2012 was $51,017, meaning that the typical family of four in the
U.S. makes about $140 a day… 70 times as much as the global poverty standard.
What do all
these statistics really mean, though?
The typical
American philosophical response (leaving aside the cretins who simply don’t
care about the fates of others) is to wonder what we can do to help raise others out of their poverty. This is a natural response – how do we help them get what we have? There are several
different approaches within the framework of this basic understanding of “the
problem”… ranging from wealth redistribution schemes on the socialist end of
the spectrum to sending economic missionaries to teach classes on free
enterprise on the libertarian/free market economics end of the spectrum.
We believe
they have both misunderstood the problem.
Measuring
wealth in terms of monetary income is natural; the meaningful unit of economic
exchanges has always been money – in fact, reading, writing and arithmetic, the
sine qua non of civilization, were
largely invented in order to deal with the problem of measuring wealth in just
such terms.
However…
measuring wealth in terms of money
ignores the more fundamental reality that genuine wealth can only truly be
understood in terms of contentment. And while the two different ways of looking
at economic prosperity (or lack thereof) often mirror one another… there is a
point of diminishing returns on wealth, a point beyond which more money brings
only unhappiness, discontent, and a spiritual cancer – frequently to others,
but almost always to oneself.
There are
obvious benefits to “having enough”:
adequate food, clothing and shelter formed the holy trinity of wealth
for early humans on the plains of the Serengeti, whose chief concerns lay in
getting enough to eat, staying out of the sun and rain, and keeping clear of
saber-toothed tigers. Many of the same
concerns still abound today, added to a few others with a more modern feel –
adequate drinking water, access to education for one’s children, good health
care, sufficient law and order to protect whatever possessions one does have
from the marauding of one’s fellow humans.
In 1943,
psychologist Abraham Maslow’s paper “A Theory of Human Motivation” laid out a
hierarchy of needs which has been the roadmap for much of the discussion on
contentment that has taken place ever since.
According to Maslow, human ambition climbs as each level of need is attained
– once basic physical needs are met, one can focus on security; once security
is obtained, one can seek emotional fulfillment, and so on. His levels are as follows:
Level One
|
Physiological
|
Air, food, water, sex, sleep, homeostasis, excretion
|
Level Two
|
Safety
|
Security of body, of employment, of resources, of the family, of
health, of property
|
Level Three
|
Love/Belonging
|
Friendship, family, sexual intimacy
|
Level Four
|
Esteem
|
Self-esteem, confidence, achievement, respect of others, respect by
others
|
Level Five
|
Self-actualization
|
Morality, creativity, spontaneity, problem solving, lack of
prejudice, acceptance of facts
|
In context
of a discussion of wealth, one thing becomes readily apparent almost
immediately when attempting to apply the hierarchy to individual human
economies – practically everyone everywhere will have a different way of
meeting virtually everything on this list of needs. At the very base of the hierarchy… it costs
more money to get clean air, food, water, etc. in some places than others.
A hermit on
a hillside farm in Bhutan may have plenty of clean air to breathe, plenty of
food and water… a single mother in Nairobi may have to wear a kerchief over her
nose if smog descends, and she may need to boil her water to kill microbes, and
unless she grows her own food in bags of soil hung from the balcony of her
apartment building, or in an abandoned alleyway, she will have to buy what her
family needs from a local market.
And the
market from which someone in Beijing buys produce may have a different
nutritional value than the equivalent market in Darfur, or Sao Palo, or Quebec,
or Los Angeles, or Quito.
We cannot
even begin climbing the pyramid of needs, in other words, without encountering
differences in economic status throughout the world’s populations.
That having
been said… taking a deeper look at the hierarchy… no matter what the cost of
each item may be, it is possible locally
to meet that cost. The question then
becomes, once you’ve met your needs, now
what?
It is
helpful in answering that question to step back from whatever striving we may
be doing in terms of seeking wealth to ask… what would we do with it if we had
it? A quick look around at the kinds of
things the typical American family does with what they have (and often, with
credit… or put another way, with money they don’t
have…) shows that a lot of things we buy with our comparative wealth don’t
appear on the hierarchy of needs anywhere.
Television? Vacations?
Movies? Electronic gadgets? Fancy clothes? Where exactly do all these things fit?
It turns out
luxury is an attempt to satisfy unmet needs, too. We seek the comfort of luxuries because they
satisfy our desires for things we cannot directly purchase, and may otherwise
feel powerless to acquire – how often, for example, do we spend money to
participate in group events as a part of our attempts to find friendship? At first, the mind rebels against this charge
(and make no mistake, it is an accusation), but a simple thought experiment
demonstrates the truth of this idea.
Imagine a parent
playing happily with their child in the park.
Their child is laughing uproariously over some silly joke they have just
told, and is enjoying the kind of frolic one associates with a happy-go-lucky
kind of day being enjoyed by a happy-go-lucky family. Would either the parent or the child want to
trade that experience for a new pair of designer jeans? Would they want to trade that experience for
two hours at a movie theater watching a shoot-em-up? Remember, you’re trading that experience.
Would you give up the good feelings associated with an interpersonal
relationship (enjoyed for the staggering economic sum of zero dollars) for any
amount of purchased goods or services?
Life is not
always so simple as that, of course, but unless we stop to consider a
cut-and-dried example, we may not fully appreciate the distinction between emotional satisfaction and the means by which emotional satisfaction is
achieved. And if we don’t see that
distinction, we invariably seek the wrong things.
There have
been innumerable movements with countless gurus preaching more or less the same
thing we are discussing here; whether you call it “Simple Living”, or “Back to
Basics” or “Satyagraha” or “The Franciscan Order” the benefits are palpable and
real. Satisfaction comes from
gratefulness, and gratefulness is the beginning of not just the humility
central to the spiritual teachings of Jesus, Buddha, Gandhi, and countless
other gurus and rabbis, but also the beginning of emotional and physical health
and well-being.
We have
often noted that there is some selection bias involved in any nutritional study
– those who eat truly healthy diets tend to live longer and have fewer health
problems. However… those who eat truly
healthy diets tend to live more simply and intentionally, as well. They frequently have more money than they
need, not because they make so much money, but because they make so much more
money than they have any desire to spend.
Much the
same dynamic plays out on every other step of Maslow’s pyramid – once a person
satisfies a need, if they are paying attention and being sensible, they find
they need less than their fears foretold.
And the more grateful they are for what they have, the more physical,
spiritual and emotional capital they have to spend in moving on to the next
step. Ultimately, physical, spiritual
and emotional capital are more valuable – in attaining what we need – than
financial capital ever could be.
When
American ears, therefore, process the idea of $2 a day being typical for over
half the world’s population, we are more staggered than we ought to be. We can’t imagine either how we ourselves
could live that way, or how we could ever assuage our guilt for the suffering
of those who do live that way because
the overwhelming numbers seem impossible to surmount.
We don’t
need to make them financially wealthy in our terms, though. Yes, there are plenty of people in the world
who need more money than they currently have.
And yes, access to food, clean water, health care, and education are
huge issues which need to be resolved.
But the real
poverty crisis is the poverty of spirit which is felt every bit as much (and
often more) in the “wealthy” decadent West as it is in the underdeveloped
nations of the world. The bumper sticker
slogan has got it wrong – all too often we say “Live simply, that others may
simply live.” It would be more
meaningful to say “Live simply, for cryin’ out loud – if you’re not happy now,
you’re not going to be happy after your next million dollars, either.”
A little land, a chair to sit on, some chickens to scratch around... we're good.
Happy
farming!
No comments:
Post a Comment