6/12/14

Rethinking Our Place in a (Warming) New World

“It is notable that as these data records have grown longer and climate models have become more comprehensive, earlier predictions have largely been confirmed. The only real surprises have been that some changes, such as sea level rise and Arctic sea ice decline, have outpaced earlier projections.”
--“Climate Change Impacts in the United States”, U.S. National Climate Assessment, U.S. Global Change Research Program, page 2

We have, naturally, written extensively before about global warming and its likely impacts.  And most people who find this blog, whether intentionally or by accident, are likely to be of at least a relatively scientific bent, meaning that the obvious truth of global warming is taken, more or less, at face value.  There is legitimate debate in the scientific community over how quickly the Earth is warming, or what particular tipping points may exist, and what impacts will be felt where, and when, but there is no longer any legitimate debate over the most basic of questions, “Is the Earth warming?”


There are some interesting questions to be raised from a purely sociological perspective, however, in recognizing the uncomfortable truth that not everyone accepts the very real, very palpable fact that human activity is largely responsible for changes to our climate which are both irreversible and incomprehensible.  Douglas Adams once quipped that the last thing a human being needs is a true sense of perspective, since our utter insignificance would destroy any individual ego if we ever felt the full scope of it all at once.  In that context, it is perfectly natural that – in spite of overwhelming evidence – any given human being would deny that we have, collectively, done irreversible harm to the very ecosystems which allowed for our existence.

Enough warning flags have been raised about potential disasters related to climate change; we are not writing today to cause any more alarm.  Instead, we would like to suggest some small shifts in perspective which might be helpful to those who will find disaster unfathomable, even as it occurs.  The truth is, our species is likely to survive global climate change, and some members of our species, at the very least, are likely to thrive under whatever conditions emerge at the other end of the change curve.

What we are interested in is teaching people to care about the idea that we should minimize the harm we are doing, and maximize the good we can share.  Plain and simple, why don’t we all try to do what will be of most benefit to the most people?  Sounds simple… but it is a radical idea.

We would like to interject at this point that we are not talking about some utopian ideal.  Socialism, communism, fascism, libertarian capitalism… all of these economic and political ideologies are based upon prima facie assumptions which are not founded in any kind of scientific principle.  And all are inconsistent with the physical realities of human existence.  No economic theory, after all, has ever been formulated with the thought in mind that basic economic activities in and of themselves have an impact on the viability of ecosystems

The basis of economics is exploitation, and we do not mean that in a pejorative sense.  It’s the simple truth – some raw material is plundered, molded, and bartered in exchange for either another manufactured good, or else for currency, which may then be used to purchase a manufactured good.  But all of it, every last bit, begins with the extraction from nature of a raw material.  Economics of any ideological stripe are by nature at odds with the environment.

Slowly, humanity has become aware of the impact this friction has imparted – crop rotation, an invention of American farmers in the late 18th century, is an example of an adaptation humans have made to a uniquely human-caused problem, soil depletion.  There are other examples, and it is no accident that they come primarily from industries in which humans exploit other life forms.  Forestry is largely the study of how to rejuvenate woods which have been exploited for lumber.  Fishery science largely relates to management of fish populations exploited for human consumption.  Even the field of microbiology is inundated with studies related to molds, bacteria and viruses which have undergone wild evolutionary shifts due to human behavior.

So – human beings are changing the world in ways we do not always immediately perceive.  Some of those changes have consequences we would probably not have invited upon ourselves had we been aware beforehand, but since it is too late now to remake those fateful first choices, what ought we to do about it?

*Revisit cosmological assumptions – most world religions (Buddhism being the most notable exception) place humanity at the center of existence.  Even historically, this makes little sense, but it is especially narcissistic and asinine at a time when we know that the universe has been expanding for  14 billion years, and that even if there are other self-aware beings elsewhere in that vast, inconceivable void, we will likely (the laws of physics being what they are) never encounter them.  The basic problem with most human religions is… the stage (aka “The Universe”) is far too big for the drama (aka “our measly little human problems”).  No offense to anyone, of course.  We’re just not really that important, universally speaking.


*Redefine our values – note we do not say “change”; we must merely find a way to restate our human values within a more realistic context.  There is an almost universal moral aversion to murder, for example.  Perhaps we would be better served by asking ourselves why we share so many fundamental moral opinions.  In context of global warming… are there things we would not be doing if only we had the perspective from which to see what impact they are having?  Who would consciously buy a Hummer, for example, if they realized that guzzling gas at a ridiculous 8 miles to the gallon was causing every man, woman and child in Vanuatu to be homeless?  Yet, that is precisely what has happened.  You drive a gas guzzler, you are guilty.  QED.

*Educate ourselves to the degree possible/plausible.  Not everyone is capable of reading through a Scientific American article and making heads or tails of what has been said/described/discovered/discredited.  However, everyone is capable of reading more than one source (yes, I’m talking to you, FOX News viewers), and paying attention to what kinds of consensus are being built around given ideas.  You would never know from talking to a member of John Q. Public who is a “climate skeptic” that 97% of the scientists who study climate hold the belief that not only is warming happening, but that humans are the primary cause of warming.  This is because the general public, in general, chooses not to be educated.

TheU.S. National Climate Assessment released earlier this year is an excellent place to start, for those who do not truly understand the issues involved.  For one thing, over 300 different scientists both in and out of government worked on this document.  For another, the issue is broken out into a variety of contexts – global warming is discussed in terms of each sector of the economy, and for each section of the country, and response strategies are laid out (both for government and the private sector).

Perhaps the saddest (most telling?) part of the whole story is that much of the American South – home to some of the most closed-minded, bigoted, ignorant climate change deniers in the world – is actually experiencing either only modest temperature increases, or even (particularly for large swaths of Mississippi and Alabama) declining temperatures.  For a self-absorbed population with a history of egocentrism (okay, too polite – we’ll go ahead and say it, racism), it makes perfect sense that there would be an inelegant ignorance of what is happening in the rest of the world.

But make no mistake, we are all in this same lifeboat together.  There are few local advantages to be gleaned from a collapse of global ecosystems.  Adaptation and survival will depend very much on not only our own actions, but also on the actions of our fellow humans hundreds and thousands of miles away from us – we must all hang together, or we shall all hang separately.

As a healthy place to start, we humbly ask that you read the U.S. National Climate Assessment.  Even if you find it a bit dry, we promise… it’s better for your brain than turning on the tube to find out what that wacky Kardashian clan is up to.  Seriously.


Happy farming!

No comments:

Post a Comment